Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Hold thy tongue

I wrote this more than a year ago for my Film Review as a Genre class. My feelings about this movie, turning 20 years old this year, have not changed. Fans of Johnny and Tim Burton, prepare to hate me:

Edward Scissorhands; directed by Tim Burton, 1990

Edward Scissorhands’s cinematic creator Tim Burton has constructed at once a lushly visual and drably emblematic piece that is supposed to emblazon the plight of the outcasts. It’s too bad the outcast in this film has no point of view. Burton’s Edward (Johnny Depp) is surrounded by quite a flock of pick-a-little-talk-a-little housewives who have nothing better to do than wallow in gossip and their own societal superiority. Their snide and petty attitudes are so ubiquitous and Avon lady Peg (Diane Wiest), his saving grace, so sickeningly sweet, it’s as if we’re playing Battle of the Character Types. But then, nothing about Burton’s work is subtle, and understandably so. If these women (and their husbands, mere side notes) weren’t so obnoxious in their bright J. Crew catalog outfits and Edward so bleak and diluted in his muted tones, how else would we be able to understand how society likes to single out and alienate those who differ from the majority?

The heightened and fantastical sense of reality in the world Burton has created is beautifully depicted—the streets and houses are all lined in typical cookie-cutter suburban fashion in bright pastel yellows, pinks and blues to match the polo shirts of the people who inhabit them. It just so happens that at the end of their street lies a haunted mansion, which even in sunlight screams gargoyles, bats and vampires. No one even seems to pay any attention to the place until Peg’s attempt to integrate Edward into their world, and yet it seems like this mansion has loomed in the back of their minds for quite some time. It’s like Edward’s the scary black family moving into a community of WASPs—except what Edward’s got is called a “handicap.” His hands of scissors are initially strange and intriguing, and for almost everyone, they are not a threat. The men think he’s just some kind of running gag and the women, who presumably haven’t had sex in at least eight years, are perturbingly turned on by his shearers (grooming dogs turns into grooming the housewives in an aphrodisiacal moment); how quickly they find any reason to crucify this handicapped man without blinking twice even when he’s just a victim of circumstances. They may not burn crosses outside his desolate mansion, but they certainly chase him back to where he came from—a sort of reverse white flight. Perhaps this is why Officer Allen (Dick Anthony Williams), the only black person in the whole town, seems to identify with and defend Edward so immediately; he sees a part of himself in this “freak.”

The polar opposites effect that Burton is going for would work wonderfully if there were any sense that Edward is anything more than a tortured soul. There are glimmers of personality—a humorous moment of discovery occurs when Edward explores his new bedroom and awkwardly pokes a hole in the waterbed with his razor-edged digits and it throws him into a short frenzy. Yet, Edward does not have a voice. Depp, a normally fascinating actor to watch, doesn’t do much out of the realm of blank face or faint smile. More often than not, everyone else is speaking for him, just as this story is being told from the view of would-be love interest and daughter of Peg, Kim (Winona Ryder), who saves his life by telling the mob he’s dead inside the mansion, but still leaves him up there, not even bothering to visit him ever again. Even nurturing Peg decides that integrating Edward into normal life is impossible: “He should go back, at least there he’s safe.” I guess their worlds are just too different. Integration and acceptance will only stir up unnecessary trouble.

Poor, sweet Edward Scissorhands. I am curious to know—how did you really feel when that Avon lady plucked you from your solitude and thrust you upon the pastel Pillsbury Dough-house suburbia that is conveniently right outside your door? Why do you fall so instantly for wanna-be rebel Kim? Is it terrifying when that mob of rabid, howling neighbors curse you? Considering your deafening silence and seeming incapability of uttering more than one word at a time, one would think your scissors weren’t the real “handicap”—rather, your tongue seems to be what is truly binding you to helplessness. Or did you, perhaps, accidentally snip your tongue with your massive scissors, thus leaving you unable to speak more than one colorless word at a time?

The demise of romantic comedies, the rapid rise of 3-D

Check it out:

http://www.examiner.com/american-film-institute-in-national/the-state-of-film-is-always-bleak-while-we-re-the-midst-of-it

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Babs, the quirky one

Funny Girl; directed by William Wyler, 1968

There's something about the movie musicals of the 1960s that just doesn't seem right. Visually, the colors tend to be more watered down, faded like that once bright pink dress you've put through the washing machine thrice too many times. The lens focus tends to be softer, with the edges of an image melting off gradually. The sets for most of these films look just as blatantly fake as the ones from the 1930s-1950s, but because the times had changed and the colors were so drab, it just doesn't seem acceptable anymore. And the music and story content itself tend to lack the spark and catchiness that inhabited musicals from Hollywood's Golden Age.

There are some exceptions, West Side Story being the biggest one since it came at the beginning of the decade, and Natalie Wood's terrible accent aside, it took bold risks visually and supported the choreography immensely. But after viewing Funny Girl for the first time yesterday, I was reminded just how much I really don't enjoy most of the Hollywood movie musicals of the 1960s.

Once the 1960s hit, musicals were on the decline, and the only way to get one made was to make a bloated, big budget picture so that they could trek it around the country road-house style. A movie like The Sound of Music, which was 3+ hours, could be shown for limited engagements at the nicer movie houses and charged audiences premium ticket prices. And so we went from Astaire and Rogers flicks being 110 minutes, to musicals running nearly as long as Gone With the Wind. For one of the best chronicles on how the 1960s began the transformation of Old Hollywood into the New, you should check out one of my favorite books, Pictures at a Revolution: Five Movies and the Birth of the New Hollywood.

I've always been a fan of Jule Styne, who has written the music for such great shows as Bells Are Ringing and Peter Pan, but I don't find the music for Funny Girl to be particularly exciting. Yes, I am immune to the appeal of "Don't Rain on My Parade"--I've always found it to be a rather grating tune that is too easily ruined by amateur performers. This was also my first Babs film in full (I've only been able to willingly sit through about 20 minutes of The Way We Were, even with Robert Redford's ridiculously good-looking self), and I must say, as an actress, I really like her in the role of Fanny Brice. She is very much a female Woody Allen without all the sex included--since the script is pretty tame--and she is goofy, self-deprecating, and gamine all at the same time. Still, I'm convinced that her voice is an acquired taste, much like Judy Garland's seems to be--although as anyone who knows me could tell you, the latter is most certainly my cup of tea. I can appreciate Streisand's vocal stylings, but I just don't like them.

Speaking of Joots, after viewing the entire film, I've come to the conclusion that it is essentially A Star is Born without the memorable music and the tragic ending. Despite all of the warning signs that crop up immediately--a drunk Norman Maine crashes Esther Blodgett's performance in front of a crowd of hundreds; Nicky Arnstein tells Fanny Brice that his career of choice is...gambling--the female protagonists fall in love with their respective men anyway, all the while climbing to the top of their careers as their insecure husbands watch desolately from below and spin into madness because their egos have been crushed and minced to pieces. And for a film made in 1968, compared to A Star is Born, Funny Girl is quite tame. A Star is Born may be longer, but it definitely doesn't feel as long; once Funny Girl loses all sight of Fanny's career and focuses on the relationship between her and Nicky, it just has absolutely nowhere to go. There's nothing new to say about what goes on between the two of them, and it drags and lugs along for another hour. Their amicable decision to separate at the film's conclusion is so devoid of tension and drama that I almost wished the writers had just decided to have Nicky drown himself in the ocean, especially since the entire story takes liberties with the facts of Fanny's life anyway.